No, of course not.
At some point, we will have a camera that combines technology like those listed below in a wafer configuration that ultimately means capturing everything around you, all the time, with the ability to reconfigure at will.
beaucoup frames per second
for the ability to refocus at will.
a 20’x24″ negative, for resolution.
sensitivity in all light levels
hologram experience you can walk through.
Perhaps then the difference between a “still” and “motion” photographer will harder to delineate.
But how can one kill the other? That’s just silly.
It will look awesome on my Dick Tracy wristwatch TV.
Is it because I’m left handed?
Afraid of success?
If I were to go with my opposite instinct at the moment of truth, would the outcome be different?
I just had an acid flashback where Matthew Brady bitch slapped a guy who was in process of photographing his omelette with an iphone…
Or, the tools of media production have changed a lot in recent years. Smoke ’em if you got ’em. Discuss.